↓ Skip to main content

Viewpoints on Factors for Successful Employment for Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Viewpoints on Factors for Successful Employment for Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2015
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0139281
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melissa Scott, Marita Falkmer, Sonya Girdler, Torbjörn Falkmer

Abstract

This article explores the key factors for successful employment from the viewpoints of adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and employers. Two groups of individuals participated in this study, 40 adults with ASD and 35 employers. Q method was used to understand and contrast the viewpoints of the two groups. Data were analysed using by-person varimax rotation factor analysis. Results showed that although both groups appear committed to the employment process, the difference in their understanding regarding the type of workplace support required, job expectations and productivity requirements continues to hinder successful employment. These results highlight the need to facilitate communication between employees and employers to ensure a clear understanding of the needs of both groups are met. The use of an ASD-specific workplace tool may assist in facilitating the necessary communication between these two groups.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 198 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 15%
Student > Master 29 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Researcher 22 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 54 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 39 20%
Social Sciences 22 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 3%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 66 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,352,608
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#16,915
of 223,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,397
of 291,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#395
of 5,454 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,454 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.