↓ Skip to main content

Isometric and isokinetic hip strength and agonist/antagonist ratios in symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
42 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Isometric and isokinetic hip strength and agonist/antagonist ratios in symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement
Published in
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, October 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.10.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura E. Diamond, Tim V. Wrigley, Rana S. Hinman, Paul W. Hodges, John O’Donnell, Amir Takla, Kim L. Bennell

Abstract

This study investigated isometric and isokinetic hip strength in individuals with and without symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). The specific aims were to: (i) determine whether differences exist in isometric and isokinetic hip strength measures between groups; (ii) compare hip strength agonist/antagonist ratios between groups; and (iii) examine relationships between hip strength and self-reported measures of either hip pain or function in those with FAI. Cross-sectional. Fifteen individuals (11 males; 25±5 years) with symptomatic FAI (clinical examination and imaging (alpha angle >55° (cam FAI), and lateral centre edge angle >39° and/or positive crossover sign (combined FAI))) and 14 age- and sex-matched disease-free controls (no morphological FAI on magnetic resonance imaging) underwent strength testing. Maximal voluntary isometric contraction strength of hip muscle groups and isokinetic hip internal (IR) and external rotation (ER) strength (20°/s) were measured. Groups were compared with independent t-tests and Mann-Whitney U tests. Participants with FAI had 20% lower isometric abduction strength than controls (p=0.04). There were no significant differences in isometric strength for other muscle groups or peak isokinetic ER or IR strength. The ratio of isometric, but not isokinetic, ER/IR strength was significantly higher in the FAI group (p=0.01). There were no differences in ratios for other muscle groups. Angle of peak IR torque was the only feature correlated with symptoms. Individuals with symptomatic FAI demonstrate isometric hip abductor muscle weakness and strength imbalance in the hip rotators. Strength measurement, including agonist/antagonist ratios, may be relevant for clinical management of FAI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 207 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 15%
Student > Master 31 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 10%
Student > Postgraduate 16 8%
Other 16 8%
Other 45 21%
Unknown 52 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 20%
Sports and Recreations 36 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 63 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2016.
All research outputs
#1,522,986
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
#424
of 2,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,090
of 294,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
#6
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.