↓ Skip to main content

Germline mosaicism is a pitfall in the diagnosis of “sporadic” X-linked Alport syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nephrology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Germline mosaicism is a pitfall in the diagnosis of “sporadic” X-linked Alport syndrome
Published in
Journal of Nephrology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40620-018-0518-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takayuki Okamoto, Kandai Nozu, Kazumoto Iijima, Tadashi Ariga

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Unknown 4 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2018.
All research outputs
#18,831,119
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nephrology
#723
of 1,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,590
of 333,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nephrology
#13
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.