↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
SERIAL transmit – parallel receive (STxPRx) MR imaging produces acceptable proton image uniformity without compromising field of view or SAR guidelines for human neuroimaging at 9.4 Tesla
Published in
Journal of Magnetic Resonance, June 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jmr.2018.05.009
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Non-uniform B1+ excitation and high specific absorption rates (SAR) compromise proton MR imaging of human brain at 9.4 T (400.5 MHz). By combining a transmit/receive surface coil array using serial transmission of individual coils with a total generalized variation reconstruction of images from all coils, acceptable quality human brain imaging is demonstrated. B0 is shimmed using sodium MR imaging (105.4 MHz) with a birdcage coil. Proton MR imaging is performed with an excitation/receive array of surface coils. The modified FLASH pulse sequence transmits serially across each coil within the array thereby distributing SAR in time and space. All coils operate in receive mode. Although the excitation profile of each transmit coil is non-uniform, the sensitivity profile estimated from the non-transmit receive coils provides an acceptable sensitivity correction. Signals from all coils are combined in a total generalized variation (TGV) reconstruction to provide a full field of view image at maximum signal to noise (SNR) performance. High-resolution images across the human head are demonstrated with acceptable uniformity and SNR. Proton MR imaging of the human brain is possible with acceptable uniformity at low SAR at 9.4 Tesla using this serial excitation and parallel reception strategy with TGV reconstruction.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Student > Master 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 33%
Physics and Astronomy 2 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Engineering 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Magnetic Resonance
#1,990
of 2,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,380
of 343,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Magnetic Resonance
#15
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.