↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms of sleep-disordered breathing: causes and consequences

Overview of attention for article published in Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 2,008)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Mechanisms of sleep-disordered breathing: causes and consequences
Published in
Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, November 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00424-011-1055-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard S. T. Leung, Vikram R. Comondore, Clodagh M. Ryan, Daniel Stevens

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is very common in the general population and is characterized by ineffective inspiratory efforts against a collapsed upper airway during sleep. Collapse occurs mainly at the level of the velopharynx and oropharynx due to a combination of predisposing anatomy and the withdrawal of pharyngeal dilator activity during sleep. Central sleep apnea (CSA) is a manifestation of chemoreflex control instability, leading to periods of inadequate respiratory drive sufficient to trigger breathing, usually alternating with periods of hyperventilation. While both forms of apnea are the result of differing pathophysiology, it has become increasingly clear that OSA and CSA often coexist in the same patient, the existence of one can predispose to the other, and that the two are not as distinct as previously thought. Both OSA and CSA exert a number of acute deleterious effects including intermittent hypoxia, arousals from sleep, and swings in negative intrathoracic pressure, which in turn lead to chronic physiologic consequences such as autonomic dysregulation, endothelial dysfunction, and cardiac remodeling. These underlying pathophysiological mechanisms provide a framework for understanding why OSA and CSA may predispose to cardiovascular diseases like ischemic heart disease and stroke.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 62 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 22%
Student > Master 8 12%
Other 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 17 26%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2023.
All research outputs
#838,626
of 24,401,594 outputs
Outputs from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#16
of 2,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,273
of 144,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,401,594 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,008 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.