You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Understanding avian assemblage change within anthropogenic environments using citizen science data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Landscape & Urban Planning, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.07.006 |
| Authors |
Meera Joyce, Megan D. Barnes, Hugh P. Possingham, Berndt J. Van Rensburg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 7 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| Norway | 1 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 81% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 17% |
| Researcher | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 18 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 30 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Design | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2018.
All research outputs
#3,130,099
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Landscape & Urban Planning
#460
of 2,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,178
of 364,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape & Urban Planning
#20
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.