| Title |
The first patient diagnosed with cytochrome c oxidase deficient Leigh syndrome: Progress report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, February 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10545-006-0185-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. J. H. Coenen, J. A. M. Smeitink, M. H. Farhoud, L. G. J. Nijtmans, R. Rodenburg, A. Janssen, E. P. M. van Kaauwen, F. J. M. Trijbels, L. P. van den Heuvel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 25% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,574,799
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#712
of 1,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,069
of 155,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,870 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.