↓ Skip to main content

Protein hyperproduction in fungi by design

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Protein hyperproduction in fungi by design
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00253-018-9265-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott E. Baker

Abstract

The secretion of enzymes used by fungi to digest their environment has been exploited by humans for centuries for food and beverage production. More than a century after the first biotechnology patent, we know that the enzyme cocktails secreted by these amazing organisms have tremendous use across a number of industrial processes. Secreting the maximum titer of enzymes is critical to the economic feasibility of these processes. Traditional mutagenesis and screening approaches have generated the vast majority of strains used by industry for the production of enzymes. Until the emergence of economical next generation DNA sequencing platforms, the majority of the genes mutated in these screens remained uncharacterized at the sequence level. In addition, mutagenesis comes with a cost to an organism's fitness, making tractable rational strain design approaches an attractive alternative. As an alternative to traditional mutagenesis and screening, controlled manipulation of multiple genes involved in processes that impact the ability of a fungus to sense its environment, regulate transcription of enzyme-encoding genes, and efficiently secrete these proteins will allow for rational design of improved fungal protein production strains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Researcher 8 12%
Other 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 15 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 26%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 15 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2020.
All research outputs
#5,185,031
of 25,353,525 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#1,226
of 8,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,211
of 337,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#24
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,353,525 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,280 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.