↓ Skip to main content

Turn up the heat: thermal tolerances of lizards at La Selva, Costa Rica

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Turn up the heat: thermal tolerances of lizards at La Selva, Costa Rica
Published in
Oecologia, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00442-015-3467-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

George A. Brusch, Emily N. Taylor, Steven M. Whitfield

Abstract

Global temperature increases over the next century are predicted to contribute to the extinction of a number of taxa, including up to 40 % of all lizard species. Lizards adapted to living in lowland tropical areas are especially vulnerable because of their dependence on specific microhabitats, low vagility, and a reduced capacity to physiologically adjust to environmental change. To assess the potential effects of climate change on lizards in the lowland tropics, we measured the critical thermal maximum (CTmax) of ten species from La Selva, Costa Rica. We also examined how well body size, microhabitat type, and species predicted the CTmax. We used current temperature data along with projected temperature increases for 2080 to predict which species may be at the greatest risk at La Selva. Of the ten species sampled, four are at serious risk of lowland extirpation and three others might also be at risk under the highest predicted temperature-increase models. Forest floor lizards at La Selva have already experienced significant population declines over the past 40 years, and we found that each of the forest floor species we studied is at serious risk of local extirpation. We also found that microhabitat type is the strongest predictor of CTmax, demonstrating the profound impact habitat specialization has on the thermal limits of tropical lizards.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Brazil 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 129 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 20%
Student > Bachelor 28 20%
Student > Master 26 19%
Researcher 17 12%
Other 6 4%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 20 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 77 56%
Environmental Science 22 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 22 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2016.
All research outputs
#12,644,424
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#2,781
of 4,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,885
of 279,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#23
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.