↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Temperature on Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease and Infections: A Replicated Cohort Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Temperature on Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease and Infections: A Replicated Cohort Study
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0027784
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph M. Collaco, John McGready, Deanna M. Green, Kathleen M. Naughton, Christopher P. Watson, Timothy Shields, Scott C. Bell, Claire E. Wainwright

Abstract

Progressive lung disease accounts for the majority of morbidity and mortality observed in cystic fibrosis (CF). Beyond secondhand smoke exposure and socio-economic status, the effect of specific environmental factors on CF lung function is largely unknown.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Master 12 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 14%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 12 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2015.
All research outputs
#4,143,164
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#58,497
of 193,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,554
of 238,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#541
of 2,558 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,558 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.