↓ Skip to main content

Menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer risk: effect modification by body mass through life

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Epidemiology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer risk: effect modification by body mass through life
Published in
European Journal of Epidemiology, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10654-018-0431-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marie Søfteland Sandvei, Lars J. Vatten, Elisabeth Krefting Bjelland, Anne Eskild, Solveig Hofvind, Giske Ursin, Signe Opdahl

Abstract

It is not known whether increased breast cancer risk caused by menopausal hormone therapy (HT) depends on body mass patterns through life. In a prospective study of 483,241 Norwegian women aged 50-69 years at baseline, 7656 women developed breast cancer during follow-up (2006-2013). We combined baseline information on recalled body mass in childhood/adolescence and current (baseline) body mass index (BMI) to construct mutually exclusive life-course body mass patterns. We assessed associations of current HT use with breast cancer risk according to baseline BMI and life-course patterns of body mass, and estimated relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI). Within all levels of baseline BMI, HT use was associated with increased risk. Considering life-course body mass patterns as a single exposure, we used women who "remained at normal weight" through life as the reference, and found that being "overweight as young" was associated with lower risk (hazard ratio (HR) 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-0.94), whereas women who "gained weight" had higher risk (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.12-1.28). Compared to never users of HT who were "overweight as young", HT users who either "remained at normal weight" or "gained weight" in adulthood were at higher risk than expected when adding the separate risks (RERI 0.52, 95% CI 0.09-0.95, and RERI 0.37, 95% CI - 0.07-0.80), suggesting effect modification. Thus, we found that women who remain at normal weight or gain weight in adulthood may be more susceptible to the risk increasing effect of HT compared to women who were overweight as young.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 23%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Unspecified 2 6%
Professor 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 14 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Psychology 3 9%
Unspecified 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 15 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2019.
All research outputs
#20,529,980
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Epidemiology
#1,569
of 1,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,630
of 330,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Epidemiology
#20
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.