↓ Skip to main content

MHC II deficient infant identified by newborn screening program for SCID

Overview of attention for article published in Immunologic Research, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
MHC II deficient infant identified by newborn screening program for SCID
Published in
Immunologic Research, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12026-018-9019-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nufar Marcus, Tali Stauber, Atar Lev, Amos J. Simon, Jerry Stein, Arnon Broides, Ido Somekh, Shlomo Almashanu, Raz Somech

Abstract

Newborn screening (NBS) programs for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID), using the TREC-based assay, have enabled early diagnosis, prompt treatment, and eventually changed the natural history of affected infants. Nevertheless, it was believed that some affected infants with residual T cell, such as patients with MHC II deficiency, will be misdiagnosed by this assay. A full immune workup and genetic analysis using direct Sanger sequencing and whole exome sequencing have been performed to a patient that was identified by the Israeli NBS program for SCID. The patient was found to have severe CD4 lymphopenia with an inverted CD4/CD8 ratio, low TREC levels in peripheral blood, abnormal response to mitogen stimulation, and a skewed T cell receptor repertoire. HLA-DR expression on peripheral blood lymphocytes was undetectable suggesting a diagnosis of MHC II deficiency. Direct sequencing of the RFX5 gene revealed a stop codon change (p. R239X, c. C715T), which could cause the patient's immune phenotype. His parents were found to be heterozygote carriers for the mutation. Whole exome sequencing could not identify other potential mutations to explain his immunodeficiency. The patient underwent successful conditioned hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from healthy matched unrelated donor and is currently well and alive with full chimerism. Infants with MHC class II deficiency can potentially be identified by the TREC-based assay NBS for SCID. Therefore, MHC II molecules (e.g., HLA-DR) measurement should be part of the confirmatory immune-phenotyping for patients with positive screening results. This will make the diagnosis of such patients straightforward.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 23%
Student > Postgraduate 3 23%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 3 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Psychology 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2018.
All research outputs
#20,529,980
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Immunologic Research
#765
of 913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,630
of 330,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunologic Research
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.