| Title |
Prediction of Residual Nodal Disease at Completion Dissection Following Positive Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-018-6647-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew J. Sinnamon, Yun Song, Cimarron E. Sharon, Yu-Xiao Yang, David E. Elder, Paul J. Zhang, Xiaowei Xu, Robert E. Roses, Rachel R. Kelz, Douglas L. Fraker, Giorgos C. Karakousis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 38% |
| Mexico | 3 | 9% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Sweden | 2 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Yemen | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Romania | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 25% |
| Scientists | 6 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 25% |
| Other | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
| Professor | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 19% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 69% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2018.
All research outputs
#1,842,211
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#368
of 6,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,896
of 329,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#22
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.