↓ Skip to main content

Endogenous institutions and the possibility of reverse crowding out

Overview of attention for article published in Public Choice, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Endogenous institutions and the possibility of reverse crowding out
Published in
Public Choice, November 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11127-011-9897-5
Authors

R. Mark Isaac, Douglas A. Norton

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 57%
Other 3 21%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 50%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Philosophy 1 7%
Psychology 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2018.
All research outputs
#13,357,126
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Public Choice
#809
of 1,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,890
of 142,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Choice
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.