↓ Skip to main content

Differences in Cognitive Distortions Between Pathological and Non-Pathological Gamblers with Preferences for Chance or Skill Games

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gambling Studies, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
Title
Differences in Cognitive Distortions Between Pathological and Non-Pathological Gamblers with Preferences for Chance or Skill Games
Published in
Journal of Gambling Studies, February 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10899-010-9180-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helga Myrseth, Geir Scott Brunborg, Magnus Eidem

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
Norway 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 149 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 23%
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 22 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 75 47%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 9%
Social Sciences 12 8%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 3%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 30 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2016.
All research outputs
#18,429,163
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#656
of 860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,145
of 94,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.