| Title |
How to use molecular biology tools for the study of the anaerobic digestion process?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11157-015-9380-8 |
| Authors |
Angela Cabezas, Juliana Calabria de Araujo, Cecilia Callejas, Amandine Galès, Jérôme Hamelin, Antonella Marone, Diana Z. Sousa, Eric Trably, Claudia Etchebehere |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 275 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 265 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 56 | 20% |
| Researcher | 37 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 39 | 14% |
| Unknown | 46 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 67 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 13% |
| Engineering | 35 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 9% |
| Energy | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 9% |
| Unknown | 76 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2015.
All research outputs
#19,516,978
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology
#224
of 267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,741
of 281,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology
#12
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 267 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.