| Title |
Detecting computer-generated random responding in questionnaire-based data: A comparison of seven indices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Behavior Research Methods, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3758/s13428-018-1103-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marc Dupuis, Emanuele Meier, Félix Cuneo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 34% |
| Australia | 5 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 22 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 39 | 63% |
| Members of the public | 19 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 137 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 27% |
| Researcher | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 29 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 58 | 42% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 45 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2020.
All research outputs
#961,639
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Research Methods
#67
of 2,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,084
of 342,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Research Methods
#2
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.