↓ Skip to main content

Common variation in oxidative phosphorylation genes is not a major cause of insulin resistance or type 2 diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Common variation in oxidative phosphorylation genes is not a major cause of insulin resistance or type 2 diabetes
Published in
Diabetologia, November 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00125-011-2377-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. S. Snogdal, M. Wod, N. Grarup, M. Vestmar, T. Sparsø, T. Jørgensen, T. Lauritzen, H. Beck-Nielsen, J. E. Henriksen, O. Pedersen, T. Hansen, K. Højlund

Abstract

There is substantial evidence that mitochondrial dysfunction is linked to insulin resistance and is present in several tissues relevant to the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. Here, we examined whether common variation in genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos) contributes to type 2 diabetes susceptibility or influences diabetes-related metabolic traits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 31 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 11 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 13 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2015.
All research outputs
#6,908,917
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#2,694
of 5,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,703
of 238,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#20
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.