↓ Skip to main content

T cells and reactive oxygen species

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomedical Science, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
186 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
Title
T cells and reactive oxygen species
Published in
Journal of Biomedical Science, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12929-015-0194-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aleksey V. Belikov, Burkhart Schraven, Luca Simeoni

Abstract

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been long considered simply as harmful by-products of metabolism, which damage cellular proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids. ROS are also known as a weapon of phagocytes, employed against pathogens invading the host. However, during the last decade, an understanding has emerged that ROS also have important roles as signaling messengers in a multitude of pathways, in all cells, tissues, and organs. T lymphocytes are the key players of the adaptive immune response, which both coordinate other immune cells and destroy malignant and virus-infected cells. ROS have been extensively implicated in T-cell hyporesponsiveness, apoptosis, and activation. It has also become evident that the source, the kinetics, and the localization of ROS production all influence cell responses. Thus, the characterization of the precise mechanisms by which ROS are involved in the regulation of T-cell functions is important for our understanding of the immune response and for the development of new therapeutic treatments against immune-mediated diseases. This review summarizes the 30-year-long history of research on ROS in T lymphocytes, with the emphasis on the physiological roles of ROS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 264 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 20%
Student > Master 38 14%
Researcher 37 14%
Student > Bachelor 30 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 41 15%
Unknown 51 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 56 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 41 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 62 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,863,965
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#107
of 1,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,676
of 291,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.