↓ Skip to main content

Metabolic profile determination of 25N-NBOMe in human liver microsomes by liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Legal Medicine, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Metabolic profile determination of 25N-NBOMe in human liver microsomes by liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry
Published in
International Journal of Legal Medicine, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00414-018-1904-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hyewon Seo, In Sook Kim, Young-Hoon Kim, Hye Hyun Yoo, Jin Hong

Abstract

2-(2,5-Dimethoxy-4-nitrophenyl)-N-(2-methoxybenzyl)ethanamine (25N-NBOMe, 2C-N-NBOMe, NBOMe-2C-N) is a novel synthetic psychoactive substance of the phenethylamine chemical class. A few metabolism studies have been conducted for 25I-NBOMe, 25B-NBOMe, and 25C-NBOMe, and others, whereas 25N-NBOMe metabolism has not been researched. In this study, the in vitro metabolism of 25N-NBOMe was investigated with human liver microsomes, and the reaction mixture was analyzed using liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-Q-TOF/MS). Formation of 14 metabolites (M1-M14) was yielded with incubation of 25N-NBOMe in human liver microsomes in the presence of NADPH. The metabolites were structurally characterized on the basis of accurate mass analysis and MS/MS fragmentation patterns. The biotransformations included hydroxylation, O-demethylation, N-dealkylation, nitro reduction, dehydrogenation, carbonylation, and combinations thereof. Hydroxyl metabolite was the most abundant compound after the phase I process. These results provide helpful information establishing biomarkers in case of 25N-NBOMe ingestion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 30%
Student > Master 2 20%
Professor 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 20%
Chemistry 2 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2019.
All research outputs
#15,197,413
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#846
of 2,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,979
of 332,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#16
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.