↓ Skip to main content

Two Higgs doublets and a complex singlet: disentangling the decay topologies and associated phenomenology

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of High Energy Physics, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Two Higgs doublets and a complex singlet: disentangling the decay topologies and associated phenomenology
Published in
Journal of High Energy Physics, December 2018
DOI 10.1007/jhep12(2018)044
Authors

Sebastian Baum, Nausheen R. Shah

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 38%
Researcher 2 25%
Professor 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 6 75%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2018.
All research outputs
#17,345,186
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of High Energy Physics
#8,831
of 25,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,368
of 450,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of High Energy Physics
#241
of 554 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,109 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 554 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.