↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the quality of risk factor survey data: lessons from the WHO MONICA Project

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing the quality of risk factor survey data: lessons from the WHO MONICA Project
Published in
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, February 2006
DOI 10.1097/00149831-200602000-00017
Authors

Hanna Tolonen, Annette Dobson, Sangita Kulathinal

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 43%
Other 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 14%
Mathematics 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
#1,480
of 2,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,396
of 170,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.