↓ Skip to main content

A method of objectively evaluating improvements in laparoscopic skills

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
A method of objectively evaluating improvements in laparoscopic skills
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s004649900795
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Y. Chung, J. M. Sackier

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 32 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Master 5 15%
Professor 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 48%
Engineering 6 18%
Psychology 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 5 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2012.
All research outputs
#7,468,281
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,684
of 6,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,012
of 227,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#39
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,038 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.