↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of an interactive computer-tailored nutrition intervention in a real-life setting

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of an interactive computer-tailored nutrition intervention in a real-life setting
Published in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, February 2007
DOI 10.1207/s15324796abm3301_5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij, Veerle Stevens, Corneel Vandelanotte, Johannes Brug

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 112 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 25%
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Master 19 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 20 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 18%
Psychology 21 18%
Social Sciences 20 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Computer Science 5 4%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 28 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2013.
All research outputs
#7,468,281
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#688
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,826
of 160,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.