↓ Skip to main content

The role of economic evaluation in vaccine decision making

Overview of attention for article published in PharmacoEconomics, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The role of economic evaluation in vaccine decision making
Published in
PharmacoEconomics, September 2012
DOI 10.2165/00019053-200523090-00001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Welte, Caroline L. Trotter, W. John Edmunds, Maarten J. Postma, Philippe Beutels

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Peru 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 60 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 22%
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Other 5 8%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 40%
Social Sciences 6 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 12 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#850
of 1,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,621
of 189,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#210
of 548 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 548 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.