You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification of nine new susceptibility loci for endometrial cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-018-05427-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tracy A. O’Mara, Dylan M. Glubb, Frederic Amant, Daniela Annibali, Katie Ashton, John Attia, Paul L. Auer, Matthias W. Beckmann, Amanda Black, Manjeet K. Bolla, Hiltrud Brauch, Hermann Brenner, Louise Brinton, Daniel D. Buchanan, Barbara Burwinkel, Jenny Chang-Claude, Stephen J. Chanock, Chu Chen, Maxine M. Chen, Timothy H. T. Cheng, Christine L. Clarke, Mark Clendenning, Linda S. Cook, Fergus J. Couch, Angela Cox, Marta Crous-Bous, Kamila Czene, Felix Day, Joe Dennis, Jeroen Depreeuw, Jennifer Anne Doherty, Thilo Dörk, Sean C. Dowdy, Matthias Dürst, Arif B. Ekici, Peter A. Fasching, Brooke L. Fridley, Christine M. Friedenreich, Lin Fritschi, Jenny Fung, Montserrat García-Closas, Mia M. Gaudet, Graham G. Giles, Ellen L. Goode, Maggie Gorman, Christopher A. Haiman, Per Hall, Susan E. Hankison, Catherine S. Healey, Alexander Hein, Peter Hillemanns, Shirley Hodgson, Erling A. Hoivik, Elizabeth G. Holliday, John L. Hopper, David J. Hunter, Angela Jones, Camilla Krakstad, Vessela N. Kristensen, Diether Lambrechts, Loic Le Marchand, Xiaolin Liang, Annika Lindblom, Jolanta Lissowska, Jirong Long, Lingeng Lu, Anthony M. Magliocco, Lynn Martin, Mark McEvoy, Alfons Meindl, Kyriaki Michailidou, Roger L. Milne, Miriam Mints, Grant W. Montgomery, Rami Nassir, Håkan Olsson, Irene Orlow, Geoffrey Otton, Claire Palles, John R. B. Perry, Julian Peto, Loreall Pooler, Jennifer Prescott, Tony Proietto, Timothy R. Rebbeck, Harvey A. Risch, Peter A. W. Rogers, Matthias Rübner, Ingo Runnebaum, Carlotta Sacerdote, Gloria E. Sarto, Fredrick Schumacher, Rodney J. Scott, V. Wendy Setiawan, Mitul Shah, Xin Sheng, Xiao-Ou Shu, Melissa C. Southey, Anthony J. Swerdlow, Emma Tham, Jone Trovik, Constance Turman, Jonathan P. Tyrer, Celine Vachon, David VanDen Berg, Adriaan Vanderstichele, Zhaoming Wang, Penelope M. Webb, Nicolas Wentzensen, Henrica M. J. Werner, Stacey J. Winham, Alicja Wolk, Lucy Xia, Yong-Bing Xiang, Hannah P. Yang, Herbert Yu, Wei Zheng, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Alison M. Dunning, Peter Kraft, Immaculata De Vivo, Ian Tomlinson, Douglas F. Easton, Amanda B. Spurdle, Deborah J. Thompson |
| Abstract |
Endometrial cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer of the female reproductive tract in developed countries. Through genome-wide association studies (GWAS), we have previously identified eight risk loci for endometrial cancer. Here, we present an expanded meta-analysis of 12,906 endometrial cancer cases and 108,979 controls (including new genotype data for 5624 cases) and identify nine novel genome-wide significant loci, including a locus on 12q24.12 previously identified by meta-GWAS of endometrial and colorectal cancer. At five loci, expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analyses identify candidate causal genes; risk alleles at two of these loci associate with decreased expression of genes, which encode negative regulators of oncogenic signal transduction proteins (SH2B3 (12q24.12) and NF1 (17q11.2)). In summary, this study has doubled the number of known endometrial cancer risk loci and revealed candidate causal genes for future study. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 33% |
| United States | 5 | 19% |
| Australia | 3 | 11% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 56% |
| Scientists | 7 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 37 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,169,550
of 25,353,525 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#18,206
of 56,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,317
of 337,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#479
of 1,340 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,353,525 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 56,306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,340 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.