↓ Skip to main content

The Use of Skilled Strategies in Social Interactions by Groups High and Low in Self-Reported Social Skill

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
The Use of Skilled Strategies in Social Interactions by Groups High and Low in Self-Reported Social Skill
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10803-011-1381-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shelley Channon, Ruth Collins, Eleanor Swain, Mary-Beth Young, Sian Fitzpatrick

Abstract

Individuals high or low in self-reported social skill were recruited opportunistically. When presented with everyday social scenarios ending with an awkward request or offer, the high social skill participants more often used sophisticated strategies that showed greater consideration for all parties. By contrast, the low skill participants were more reliant on simple strategies including acquiescence or refusal, and the emotional tone of their responses was less positive. Greater reliance on sophisticated rather than simple strategies may be linked to more successful social interactions. The potential implications are considered for understanding everyday performance in skilled individuals and populations with limited social skills, such as those with autistic spectrum disorders.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 85 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Researcher 6 7%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 18 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 43%
Social Sciences 10 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 8%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 21 24%