↓ Skip to main content

Accumulation by Dispossession and Its Limits: The Southern Africa Paradigm Revisited

Overview of attention for article published in Studies in Comparative International Development, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
Title
Accumulation by Dispossession and Its Limits: The Southern Africa Paradigm Revisited
Published in
Studies in Comparative International Development, November 2010
DOI 10.1007/s12116-010-9075-7
Authors

Giovanni Arrighi, Nicole Aschoff, Ben Scully

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 134 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 28%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Lecturer 9 7%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 26 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 68 50%
Arts and Humanities 10 7%
Environmental Science 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 4%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 27 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2018.
All research outputs
#8,880,246
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Studies in Comparative International Development
#179
of 366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,112
of 115,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Studies in Comparative International Development
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.