↓ Skip to main content

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty is a promising option in thalassemic patients with inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Balloon pulmonary angioplasty is a promising option in thalassemic patients with inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
Published in
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11239-018-1720-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Panagiotis Karyofyllis, Dimitris Tsiapras, Varvara Papadopoulou, Michael D. Diamantidis, Paraskevi Fotiou, Eftychia Demerouti, Vassilis Voudris

Abstract

Pulmonary hypertension (PH), a serious disorder with a high morbidity and mortality rate, is known to occur in a number of unrelated systemic diseases. β-Thalassaemia, among other haematological disorders, develop PH which is not an infrequent finding and worsens the prognosis. Haemolysis, iron overload and hypercoagulable state are among the main pathogenetic mechanisms. Haemoglobinopathies and congenital haemolytic anaemia constitute a unique patients population more predisposed to developing chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Although pulmonary endarterectomy is accepted as the best treatment for CTEPH, surgery in these patients poses significant practical challenges given the distinct nature of the disease. As drug therapy is not expected to offer relief from the mechanical obstructions of pulmonary arteries and the use of specific pulmonary arterial hypertension drugs is not established in thalassaemia patients, the novel technique of balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) may emerge as a new therapeutic option for patients with inoperable CTEPH and thalassaemia. We are reporting the case of a thalassaemic patient with a history of splenectomy suffering from progressive severe pulmonary hypertension related to chronic thromboembolic disease, who was successfully treated by BPA with substantial improvement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 33%
Unspecified 1 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Unknown 7 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2018.
All research outputs
#15,542,971
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
#640
of 994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,865
of 330,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
#11
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.