↓ Skip to main content

Low level of genetic diversity in cultivated Pigeonpea compared to its wild relatives is revealed by diversity arrays technology

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical and Applied Genetics, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
168 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Low level of genetic diversity in cultivated Pigeonpea compared to its wild relatives is revealed by diversity arrays technology
Published in
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, July 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00122-006-0317-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shiying Yang, Wen Pang, Gavin Ash, John Harper, Jason Carling, Peter Wenzl, Eric Huttner, Xuxiao Zong, Andrzej Kilian

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Brazil 2 2%
Indonesia 1 1%
India 1 1%
Ethiopia 1 1%
Unknown 91 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 11%
Student > Master 7 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 14 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 70%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Engineering 3 3%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 16 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2015.
All research outputs
#16,031,680
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#2,892
of 3,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,414
of 67,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#22
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.