↓ Skip to main content

The relativity of biological function

Overview of attention for article published in Theory in Biosciences, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
The relativity of biological function
Published in
Theory in Biosciences, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12064-015-0215-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manfred D. Laubichler, Peter F. Stadler, Sonja J. Prohaska, Katja Nowick

Abstract

Function is a central concept in biological theories and explanations. Yet discussions about function are often based on a narrow understanding of biological systems and processes, such as idealized molecular systems or simple evolutionary, i.e., selective, dynamics. Conflicting conceptions of function continue to be used in the scientific literature to support certain claims, for instance about the fraction of "functional DNA" in the human genome. Here we argue that all biologically meaningful interpretations of function are necessarily context dependent. This implies that they derive their meaning as well as their range of applicability only within a specific theoretical and measurement context. We use this framework to shed light on the current debate about functional DNA and argue that without considering explicitly the theoretical and measurement contexts all attempts to integrate biological theories are prone to fail.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 6%
Mexico 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Denmark 1 3%
Luxembourg 1 3%
Unknown 28 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 15%
Philosophy 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2017.
All research outputs
#14,393,352
of 23,508,125 outputs
Outputs from Theory in Biosciences
#109
of 200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,114
of 279,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theory in Biosciences
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,508,125 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.