↓ Skip to main content

Pre-therapy Somatostatin Receptor-Based Heterogeneity Predicts Overall Survival in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients Undergoing Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Imaging and Biology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Pre-therapy Somatostatin Receptor-Based Heterogeneity Predicts Overall Survival in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients Undergoing Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy
Published in
Molecular Imaging and Biology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11307-018-1252-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rudolf A. Werner, Harun Ilhan, Sebastian Lehner, László Papp, Norbert Zsótér, Imke Schatka, Dirk O. Muegge, Mehrbod S. Javadi, Takahiro Higuchi, Andreas K. Buck, Peter Bartenstein, Frank Bengel, Markus Essler, Constantin Lapa, Ralph A. Bundschuh

Abstract

Early identification of aggressive disease could improve decision support in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET) patients prior to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). The prognostic value of intratumoral textural features (TF) determined by baseline somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positron emission tomography (PET) before PRRT was analyzed. Thirty-one patients with G1/G2 pNET were enrolled (G2, n = 23/31). Prior to PRRT with [177Lu]DOTATATE (mean, 3.6 cycles), baseline SSTR-PET computed tomography was performed. By segmentation of 162 (median per patient, 5) metastases, intratumoral TF were computed. The impact of conventional PET parameters (SUVmean/max), imaging-based TF, and clinical parameters (Ki67, CgA) for prediction of both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after PRRT were evaluated. Within a median follow-up of 3.7 years, tumor progression was detected in 21 patients (median, 1.5 years) and 13/31 deceased (median, 1.9 years). In ROC analysis, the TF entropy, reflecting derangement on a voxel-by-voxel level, demonstrated predictive capability for OS (cutoff = 6.7, AUC = 0.71, p = 0.02). Of note, increasing entropy could predict a longer survival (> 6.7, OS = 2.5 years, 17/31), whereas less voxel-based derangement portended inferior outcome (< 6.7, OS = 1.9 years, 14/31). These findings were supported in a G2 subanalysis (> 6.9, OS = 2.8 years, 9/23 vs. < 6.9, OS = 1.9 years, 14/23). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significant distinction between high- and low-risk groups using entropy (n = 31, p < 0.05). For those patients below the ROC-derived threshold, the relative risk of death after PRRT was 2.73 (n = 31, p = 0.04). Ki67 was negatively associated with PFS (p = 0.002); however, SUVmean/max failed in prognostication (n.s.). In contrast to conventional PET parameters, assessment of intratumoral heterogeneity demonstrated superior prognostic performance in pNET patients undergoing PRRT. This novel PET-based strategy of outcome prediction prior to PRRT might be useful for patient risk stratification.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 12 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 48%
Linguistics 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 15 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2018.
All research outputs
#14,789,745
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Imaging and Biology
#448
of 837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,319
of 339,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Imaging and Biology
#12
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.