↓ Skip to main content

A simple prognostic index for Shigatoxin-related hemolytic uremic syndrome at onset: data from the ItalKid-HUS network

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
A simple prognostic index for Shigatoxin-related hemolytic uremic syndrome at onset: data from the ItalKid-HUS network
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00431-018-3198-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gianluigi Ardissino, Francesca Tel, Sara Testa, Fabio Paglialonga, Selena Longhi, Laura Martelli, Silvia Consolo, Damiano Picicco, Antonella Dodaro, Laura Daprai, Rosaria Colombo, Milena Arghittu, Michela Perrone, Giovanna Chidini, Stefano Scalia Catenacci, Isabella Cropanese, Dario Consonni, on behalf of the ItalKid-HUS Network

Abstract

Shigatoxin Escherichia coli-related hemolytic uremic syndrome (eHUS) is a severe thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) burdened by life-threatening complications and long-term sequelae. Since hemoconcentration is associated with worse outcome, we tried to develop a reliable and easy-to-calculate index for predicting complications and sequelae based on hemoglobin (Hb) at presentation. The first laboratory examinations with signs of TMA in eHUS patients were analyzed in relation to the outcomes with the receiver operating characteristic curves and their areas under the curve (AUC) for Hb and creatinine (sCr). A total of 197 eHUS patients were identified of whom 24% did not have anemia at presentation. Hb level was the best predictor of a poor outcome (AUC 0.67) but the combination of Hb with sCr, in the formula [(Hb in g/dL + (sCr in mg/dL × 2)], showed an even better AUC of 0.75. The described scoring system was also strongly associated and predictive of all complications and health care needs (8% of patients with scoring > 13 died or entered a permanent vegetative state compared with 0% of those with ≤ 13). The presented score is a simple and early predictor of both short- and long-term outcomes and identifies patients who should undergo rapid volume expansion to counteract hemoconcentration, the spreading of microvascular thrombosis, and the consequent increased organ damage. What is Known: • In eHUS, hemoconcentration is associated with worse short- and long-term outcome. • A prognostic index to identify patients at higher risk for complications at presentation is not available. What is New: • We developed a simple and early prognostic index for eHUS outcome with the combination of Hb and sCr at onset, in the following formula [(Hb in g/dL + (sCr in mg/dL × 2)]. • The proposed HUS Severity Score can promptly identify patients with good outcome and those with high risk of worse short- and long-term outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 10 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 38%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2018.
All research outputs
#6,467,470
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1,259
of 3,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,673
of 331,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#35
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.