↓ Skip to main content

Fluoro-edenitic fibres in the sputum of subjects from Biancavilla (Sicily): a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Fluoro-edenitic fibres in the sputum of subjects from Biancavilla (Sicily): a pilot study
Published in
Environmental Health, June 2006
DOI 10.1186/1476-069x-5-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Grazia Putzu, Caterina Bruno, Amerigo Zona, Marilena Massiccio, Roberto Pasetto, Pier Giorgio Piolatto, Pietro Comba

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 38%
Researcher 2 25%
Lecturer 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 50%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,810,411
of 23,700,294 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#866
of 1,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,068
of 53,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,700,294 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.