You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Recent advances in dengue pathogenesis and clinical management
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Vaccine, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.09.103 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cameron P. Simmons, Kirsty McPherson, Nguyen Van Vinh Chau, D.T. Hoai Tam, Paul Young, Jason Mackenzie, Bridget Wills |
| Abstract |
This review describes and commentates on recent advances in the understanding of dengue pathogenesis and immunity, plus clinical research on vaccines and therapeutics. We expand specifically on the role of the dermis in dengue virus infection, the contribution of cellular and humoral immune responses to pathogenesis and immunity, NS1 and mechanisms of virus immune evasion. Additionally we review a series of therapeutic intervention trials for dengue, as well as recent clinical research aimed at improving clinical diagnosis, risk prediction and disease classification. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 311 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 304 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 15% |
| Researcher | 35 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 8% |
| Other | 48 | 15% |
| Unknown | 72 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 79 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 38 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 26 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 44 | 14% |
| Unknown | 80 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2018.
All research outputs
#7,777,586
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Vaccine
#7,705
of 16,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,391
of 291,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vaccine
#96
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.