↓ Skip to main content

Effects of packed red blood cell storage duration on post-transfusion clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of packed red blood cell storage duration on post-transfusion clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis and systematic review
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00134-015-4078-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monica Suet Ying Ng, Angela Suet Yeung Ng, Jessica Chan, John-Paul Tung, John Francis Fraser

Abstract

There is substantial conjecture regarding the clinical significance of packed red blood cell (PRBC) changes that occur during in vitro storage. Here, we present a meta- and systematic analysis of adult studies published between 1994 and 2015 with the aim of updating existing quantitative reviews and providing a comprehensive cover of the six most commonly studied outcomes-mortality, infection, renal dysfunction, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), thrombotic complications and prolonged hospital length of stay. Computerised searches of Pubmed and EMBASE identified publications that reported target outcomes and PRBC storage duration prior to transfusion. Bibliographies of relevant literature were manually searched to incorporate missed studies. Randomised controlled trial (RCT) data was meta-analysed using a random effects model with Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.1 software. Observational investigations were systematically reviewed. Sixty-four papers were selected covering 462,581 patients with the majority of studies being observational in nature. Meta-analysis of eight RCTs demonstrated a trend towards decreased mortality with stored PRBC transfusion; albeit this effect was not statistically significant (OR 0.91, 95 % CI 0.78-1.05, p = 0.20). In a small subset of intensive care unit (ICU), cardiac surgery and trauma patients; observational studies suggested that prolonged storage may be correlated with increased mortality. Trauma and cardiac surgery patients appeared to be most susceptible to the potential infectious complications of stored PRBCs. Stored PRBCs were unlikely to affect thrombotic complications or hospital length of stay. There were inadequate data to determine whether stored PRBCs had clinically relevant effects on renal dysfunction and MODS. Although literature presents a concerning picture of potential storage complications, current findings are too inconsistent to drive changes in clinical practice. Results from current RCTs will likely play a role in PRBC age guidelines for cardiac surgery and ICU patients. However, these studies may be less efficacious at detecting small effects that are limited to specific subpopulations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Researcher 7 11%
Other 5 8%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 11 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 11 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,186,135
of 24,230,934 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,993
of 5,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,229
of 282,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#13
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,230,934 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.