You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Do genome‐scale models need exact solvers or clearer standards?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular Systems Biology, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.15252/msb.20156157 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ali Ebrahim, Eivind Almaas, Eugen Bauer, Aarash Bordbar, Anthony P Burgard, Roger L Chang, Andreas Dräger, Iman Famili, Adam M Feist, Ronan MT Fleming, Stephen S Fong, Vassily Hatzimanikatis, Markus J Herrgård, Allen Holder, Michael Hucka, Daniel Hyduke, Neema Jamshidi, Sang Yup Lee, Nicolas Le Novère, Joshua A Lerman, Nathan E Lewis, Ding Ma, Radhakrishnan Mahadevan, Costas Maranas, Harish Nagarajan, Ali Navid, Jens Nielsen, Lars K Nielsen, Juan Nogales, Alberto Noronha, Csaba Pal, Bernhard O Palsson, Jason A Papin, Kiran R Patil, Nathan D Price, Jennifer L Reed, Michael Saunders, Ryan S Senger, Nikolaus Sonnenschein, Yuekai Sun, Ines Thiele |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 33% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Myanmar | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Denmark | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 48% |
| Scientists | 9 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 3% |
| Denmark | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Latvia | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 175 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 23% |
| Researcher | 38 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 12% |
| Professor | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 19% |
| Unknown | 26 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 42 | 22% |
| Engineering | 19 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 15 | 8% |
| Chemical Engineering | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Unknown | 38 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2015.
All research outputs
#2,393,498
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Systems Biology
#399
of 1,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,713
of 291,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Systems Biology
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.