↓ Skip to main content

5-Aminolevulinic acid fluorescence guided surgery for recurrent high-grade gliomas

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
5-Aminolevulinic acid fluorescence guided surgery for recurrent high-grade gliomas
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11060-018-2956-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muhammad Omar Chohan, Mitchel S. Berger

Abstract

Fluorescence guided surgery (FGS) with five-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) is expected to revolutionize neurosurgical care of patients with high-grade gliomas (HGG). After the recent landmark FDA approval, this optical agent is now available to neurosurgeons in the United States. This review is designed to highlight the evidence for the use of 5-ALA in recurrent HGG surgery for the neurosurgical community. The manuscript was prepared in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Intra-operatively, a strong fluorescent signal is highly correlated with the presence of cellular tumor in recurrent HGG, giving it a high positive predictive value (PPV). Similar to what is observed in primary HGG surgery, false-negative results can occur if tumor cells do not emit fluorescence. In addition, false-positive fluorescence signals in tissues devoid of tumor cells can be observed more frequently in recurrent HGG compared to the primary setting. However, these areas overwhelmingly contain reactive/regressive tissue, resection of which is unlikely to cause functional deficits. The safety profile of 5-ALA is similarly favorable in primary and recurrent HGG. 5-ALA FGS is a powerful adjunct in the resection of recurrent HGG with a high PPV and favorable safety profile. It is therefore the authors' opinion to routinely employ this fluorescent agent as a standard of care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Other 5 10%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 35%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Chemistry 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 17 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2021.
All research outputs
#7,326,749
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#993
of 2,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,762
of 331,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#26
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,994 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.