↓ Skip to main content

Facet joint syndrome: from diagnosis to interventional management

Overview of attention for article published in Insights into Imaging, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 1,279)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
31 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
51 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
529 Mendeley
Title
Facet joint syndrome: from diagnosis to interventional management
Published in
Insights into Imaging, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13244-018-0638-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Romain Perolat, Adrian Kastler, Benjamin Nicot, Jean-Michel Pellat, Florence Tahon, Arnaud Attye, Olivier Heck, Kamel Boubagra, Sylvie Grand, Alexandre Krainik

Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) is the most common pain syndrome, and is an enormous burden and cost generator for society. Lumbar facet joints (FJ) constitute a common source of pain, accounting for 15-45% of LBP. Facet joint degenerative osteoarthritis is the most frequent form of facet joint pain. History and physical examination may suggest but not confirm facet joint syndrome. Although imaging (radiographs, MRI, CT, SPECT) for back pain syndrome is very commonly performed, there are no effective correlations between clinical symptoms and degenerative spinal changes. Diagnostic positive facet joint block can indicate facet joints as the source of chronic spinal pain. These patients may benefit from specific interventions to eliminate facet joint pain such as neurolysis, by radiofrequency or cryoablation. The purpose of this review is to describe the anatomy, epidemiology, clinical presentation, and radiologic findings of facet joint syndrome. Specific interventional facet joint management will also be described in detail. • Lumbar facet joints constitute a common source of pain accounting of 15-45%. • Facet arthrosis is the most frequent form of facet pathology. • There are no effective correlations between clinical symptoms, physical examination and degenerative spinal changes. • Diagnostic positive facet joint block can indicate facet joints as the source of pain. • After selection processing, patients may benefit from facet joint neurolysis, notably by radiofrequency or cryoablation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 529 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 529 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 90 17%
Other 47 9%
Student > Postgraduate 43 8%
Student > Master 43 8%
Researcher 37 7%
Other 69 13%
Unknown 200 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 170 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 55 10%
Neuroscience 19 4%
Sports and Recreations 12 2%
Engineering 10 2%
Other 42 8%
Unknown 221 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 285. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#125,402
of 25,658,139 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#1
of 1,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,488
of 341,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,139 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.