↓ Skip to main content

Administration of an antagonist of P2X7 receptor to EAE rats prevents a decrease of expression of claudin-5 in cerebral capillaries

Overview of attention for article published in Purinergic Signalling, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Administration of an antagonist of P2X7 receptor to EAE rats prevents a decrease of expression of claudin-5 in cerebral capillaries
Published in
Purinergic Signalling, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11302-018-9620-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomasz Grygorowicz, Beata Dąbrowska-Bouta, Lidia Strużyńska

Abstract

Purinergic P2X receptors, when activated under pathological conditions, participate in induction of the inflammatory response and/or cell death. Both neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration represent hallmarks of multiple sclerosis (MS), an autoimmune disease of the central nervous system. In the current study, we examined whether P2X7R is expressed in brain microvasculature of rats subjected to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and explore possible relationships with blood-brain barrier (BBB) protein-claudin-5 after administration of P2X7R antagonist-Brilliant Blue G (BBG). Capillary fraction isolated from control and EAE rat brains was subjected to immunohistochemical and Western blot analyses. We document the presence of P2X7R in brain capillaries isolated from brain tissue of EAE rats. P2X7R is found to be localized on the abluminal surface of the microvessels and is co-expressed with PDGFβR, a marker of pericytes. We also show over-expression of this receptor in isolated capillaries during the course of EAE, which is temporally correlated with a lower protein level of PDGFβR, as well as claudin-5, a tight junction-building protein. Administration of a P2X7R antagonist to the immunized rats significantly reduced clinical signs of EAE and enhances protein expression of both claudin-5 and PDGFβR. These results indicate that P2X7 receptor located on pericytes may contribute to pathological mechanisms operated during EAE in cerebral microvessels influencing the BBB integrity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 20%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 8 27%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 6 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2018.
All research outputs
#20,529,980
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Purinergic Signalling
#294
of 380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,972
of 331,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Purinergic Signalling
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 380 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.