↓ Skip to main content

Population data and phylogenetic structure of Han population from Jiangsu province of China on GlobalFiler STR loci

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Legal Medicine, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Population data and phylogenetic structure of Han population from Jiangsu province of China on GlobalFiler STR loci
Published in
International Journal of Legal Medicine, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00414-018-1815-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Atif Adnan, Xiaoni Zhan, Kadirya Kasim, Allah Rakha, Xing Jia Xin

Abstract

Forensic statistical parameters based on allelic frequencies of commonly used short tandem repeats were estimated for the Han population of Jiangsu province from P.R. China. The 6-dye GlobalFiler™ PCR amplification kit incorporates 21 autosomal STRs, providing reliable DNA typing results with enhanced the power of discrimination. Here, we analyzed the GlobalFiler™ STR loci in 516 unrelated individuals from Jiangsu Han population. A total of 256 alleles were observed ranging between 5 and 35.2 repeat units, and SE33 showed the greatest power of discrimination (34 alleles) in Jiangsu Han population. Most of the loci were found to be in the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium after the Bonferroni correction with the exception of D3S1358. The combined power of exclusion (CPE) was 0.999999996353609, and the combined match probability (CMP) was 3.64 × 10-25. Phylogenetic parameters including pairwise genetic distances showed that Han population living in Jiangsu had closest genetic relationship with other East Asian populations. The present study provides precise reference database for forensic applications and population genetic studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 17%
Student > Master 2 17%
Student > Postgraduate 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 58%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2018.
All research outputs
#15,542,971
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#977
of 2,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,054
of 331,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#26
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,091 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.