| Title |
Early and Middle Holocene Human Occupation of the Egyptian Eastern Desert: Sodmein Cave
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
African Archaeological Review, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10437-015-9195-6 |
| Authors |
Pierre M. Vermeersch, Veerle Linseele, Elena Marinova, Wim Van Neer, Jan Moeyersons, Janet Rethemeyer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 21% |
| Professor | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 18% |
| Unknown | 4 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 10 | 36% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 11% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2021.
All research outputs
#4,077,245
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from African Archaeological Review
#66
of 345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,907
of 266,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from African Archaeological Review
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.