| Title |
Body Weight and Relative Brain Size (Encephalization) in Eocene Archaeoceti (Cetacea)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Mammalian Evolution, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10914-015-9304-y |
| Authors |
Philip D. Gingerich |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Costa Rica | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 40 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 46% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,112,966
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mammalian Evolution
#25
of 441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,652
of 264,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mammalian Evolution
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them