Title |
Oncologic outcomes and technical considerations of nipple-sparing mastectomies in breast cancer: experience of 425 cases from a single institution
|
---|---|
Published in |
Breast Cancer, October 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12282-015-0651-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ayaka Shimo, Koichiro Tsugawa, Seiko Tsuchiya, Reiko Yoshie, Kyoko Tsuchiya, Tomoko Uejima, Yasuyuki Kojima, Arata Shimo, Ryosuke Hayami, Toru Nishikawa, Yukari Yabuki, Hisanori Kawamoto, Akihiko Sudo, Mamoru Fukuda, Yoshihide Kanemaki, Ichiro Maeda |
Abstract |
Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is an advantageous treatment option, providing a complete cure and good cosmetic results. We tested whether NSM is a surgically and oncologically safe technique. We evaluated the oncological outcome of 425 breasts in 413 patients who underwent NSM between January 2000 and March 2013. We retrospectively reviewed patient data and analyzed all patient characteristics as potential risk factors of recurrence at the nipple-areola complex (NAC). To confirm the oncological safety of NSM, we compared outcomes of NSM and conventional total mastectomy. The median follow-up time after surgery was 46.8 months (range 6-158 months). Nipple necrosis was observed in 6 cases (1.4 %). The cumulative local recurrence rate after NSM was 5.8 % (25/425 cases), similar to that of conventional total mastectomy in the same period (5.6 %, 49/878 cases). Furthermore, the cumulative local recurrence rate at the NAC was 2.3 % (10 cases). HER2-enriched tumors and young age (<40 years) were significant risk factors for recurrence at the NAC. In patients with recurrence, the site of recurrence was easily excised, and good cosmetic results were achieved in breast reconstruction cases. NSM is safe with a low complication rate. No significant difference was observed in cumulative local recurrence rate, cumulative distant disease recurrence rate, and overall survival between patients who underwent NSM or conventional total mastectomy, confirming that NSM was surgically and oncologically safe. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 33% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Denmark | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 56 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 19% |
Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 17% |
Unknown | 22 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 40% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 24 | 41% |