↓ Skip to main content

Oncologic outcomes and technical considerations of nipple-sparing mastectomies in breast cancer: experience of 425 cases from a single institution

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Oncologic outcomes and technical considerations of nipple-sparing mastectomies in breast cancer: experience of 425 cases from a single institution
Published in
Breast Cancer, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12282-015-0651-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ayaka Shimo, Koichiro Tsugawa, Seiko Tsuchiya, Reiko Yoshie, Kyoko Tsuchiya, Tomoko Uejima, Yasuyuki Kojima, Arata Shimo, Ryosuke Hayami, Toru Nishikawa, Yukari Yabuki, Hisanori Kawamoto, Akihiko Sudo, Mamoru Fukuda, Yoshihide Kanemaki, Ichiro Maeda

Abstract

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is an advantageous treatment option, providing a complete cure and good cosmetic results. We tested whether NSM is a surgically and oncologically safe technique. We evaluated the oncological outcome of 425 breasts in 413 patients who underwent NSM between January 2000 and March 2013. We retrospectively reviewed patient data and analyzed all patient characteristics as potential risk factors of recurrence at the nipple-areola complex (NAC). To confirm the oncological safety of NSM, we compared outcomes of NSM and conventional total mastectomy. The median follow-up time after surgery was 46.8 months (range 6-158 months). Nipple necrosis was observed in 6 cases (1.4 %). The cumulative local recurrence rate after NSM was 5.8 % (25/425 cases), similar to that of conventional total mastectomy in the same period (5.6 %, 49/878 cases). Furthermore, the cumulative local recurrence rate at the NAC was 2.3 % (10 cases). HER2-enriched tumors and young age (<40 years) were significant risk factors for recurrence at the NAC. In patients with recurrence, the site of recurrence was easily excised, and good cosmetic results were achieved in breast reconstruction cases. NSM is safe with a low complication rate. No significant difference was observed in cumulative local recurrence rate, cumulative distant disease recurrence rate, and overall survival between patients who underwent NSM or conventional total mastectomy, confirming that NSM was surgically and oncologically safe.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 56 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 19%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 22 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 24 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2016.
All research outputs
#13,518,925
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer
#233
of 614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,300
of 282,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 614 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.