↓ Skip to main content

Self-Esteem and National Identification in Times of Islamophobia: A Study Among Islamic School Children in The Netherlands

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Youth and Adolescence, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
Title
Self-Esteem and National Identification in Times of Islamophobia: A Study Among Islamic School Children in The Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10964-018-0906-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jochem Thijs, Lisette Hornstra, Fatima Zohra Charki

Abstract

Despite strong debates about the role of Islamic education in Western societies, very little is known about the ways these schools can affect how Muslim children feel about these societies and themselves. This research examined how the self-esteem and national identification of Islamic schools students in a non-Muslim country (N = 707; Mage = 10.02; SD = 1.25; 56.9% girls) depend on their perceptions of religious discrimination and the student-teacher relationship, as well as their teachers' religious background and implicit religious attitude. Children reported substantially more religious discrimination against their group than against themselves. Religious discrimination was associated with lower self-esteem and weaker national identification, whereas a close bond with the teacher was associated with higher self-esteem and stronger national identification. Children with a non-Muslim teacher reported more national identification than students with a Muslim teacher, but less so if this teacher had a comparatively positive attitude toward Muslims. Results provide insights on how self-esteem and national identification can be encouraged within the context of Islamic education.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 142 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 14 10%
Student > Master 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 3%
Researcher 4 3%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 82 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 22 15%
Psychology 16 11%
Arts and Humanities 6 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Linguistics 2 1%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 84 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,038,239
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#167
of 1,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,129
of 334,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#4
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.