↓ Skip to main content

Probability of bivariate superiority: A non-parametric common-language statistic for detecting bivariate relationships

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Research Methods, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Probability of bivariate superiority: A non-parametric common-language statistic for detecting bivariate relationships
Published in
Behavior Research Methods, August 2018
DOI 10.3758/s13428-018-1089-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johnson Ching-Hong Li, Rory M. Waisman

Abstract

Researchers often focus on bivariate normal correlation (r) to evaluate bivariate relationships. However, these techniques assume linearity and depend on parametric assumptions. We propose a new nonparametric statistical model that can be more intuitively understood than the conventional r: probability of bivariate superiority (PBS). Our development of Bp, the estimator of a PBS relationship, extends Dunlap's (1994) common-language transformation of r (CLr) by providing a method to directly estimate PBS-the probability that when x is above (or below) the mean of all X, its paired y score will also be above (or below) the mean of all Y. Probability of superiority is an important form of bivariate relationship that until now could only be accurately estimated when data met the parametric assumptions for r. We specify the copula that forms the theoretical basis for PBS, provide an algorithm for estimating PBS from a sample, and describe the results of a Monte Carlo experiment that evaluated our algorithm across 448 data conditions. The PBS estimate, Bp, is robust to violations of parametric assumptions and offers a useful method for evaluating the significance of probability-of-superiority relationships in bivariate data. It is critical to note that Bp estimates a different form of bivariate relationship than does r. Our working examples show that a PBS effect can be significant in the absence of a significant correlation, and vice versa. In addition to utilizing the PBS model in future research, we suggest that this new statistical procedure be used to find theoretically important but previously overlooked effects from past studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Lecturer 1 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 2 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Computer Science 1 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,459,604
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Research Methods
#270
of 2,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,990
of 341,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Research Methods
#11
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.