↓ Skip to main content

The emerging NDM carbapenemases

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Microbiology, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
525 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
563 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The emerging NDM carbapenemases
Published in
Trends in Microbiology, November 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.tim.2011.09.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrice Nordmann, Laurent Poirel, Timothy R. Walsh, David M. Livermore

Abstract

Carbapenems were the last β-lactams retaining near-universal anti-Gram-negative activity, but carbapenemases are spreading, conferring resistance. New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM) enzymes are the latest carbapenemases to be recognized and since 2008 have been reported worldwide, mostly in bacteria from patients epidemiologically linked to the Indian subcontinent, where they occur widely in hospital and community infections, and also in contaminated urban water. The main type is NDM-1, but minor variants occur. NDM enzymes are present largely in Enterobacteriaceae, but also in non-fermenters and Vibrionaceae. Dissemination predominantly involves transfer of the blaNDM-1 gene among promiscuous plasmids and clonal outbreaks. Bacteria with NDM-1 are typically resistant to nearly all antibiotics, and reliable detection and surveillance are crucial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 563 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
India 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Nigeria 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Slovakia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 541 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 102 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 97 17%
Researcher 69 12%
Student > Bachelor 59 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 40 7%
Other 93 17%
Unknown 103 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 146 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 74 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 71 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 70 12%
Chemistry 15 3%
Other 62 11%
Unknown 125 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2016.
All research outputs
#2,077,398
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Microbiology
#489
of 2,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,498
of 155,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Microbiology
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.