↓ Skip to main content

Enhancing disease surveillance with novel data streams: challenges and opportunities

Overview of attention for article published in EPJ Data Science, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
39 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enhancing disease surveillance with novel data streams: challenges and opportunities
Published in
EPJ Data Science, October 2015
DOI 10.1140/epjds/s13688-015-0054-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benjamin M Althouse, Samuel V Scarpino, Lauren Ancel Meyers, John W Ayers, Marisa Bargsten, Joan Baumbach, John S Brownstein, Lauren Castro, Hannah Clapham, Derek AT Cummings, Sara Del Valle, Stephen Eubank, Geoffrey Fairchild, Lyn Finelli, Nicholas Generous, Dylan George, David R Harper, Laurent Hébert-Dufresne, Michael A Johansson, Kevin Konty, Marc Lipsitch, Gabriel Milinovich, Joseph D Miller, Elaine O Nsoesie, Donald R Olson, Michael Paul, Philip M Polgreen, Reid Priedhorsky, Jonathan M Read, Isabel Rodríguez-Barraquer, Derek J Smith, Christian Stefansen, David L Swerdlow, Deborah Thompson, Alessandro Vespignani, Amy Wesolowski

Abstract

Novel data streams (NDS), such as web search data or social media updates, hold promise for enhancing the capabilities of public health surveillance. In this paper, we outline a conceptual framework for integrating NDS into current public health surveillance. Our approach focuses on two key questions: What are the opportunities for using NDS and what are the minimal tests of validity and utility that must be applied when using NDS? Identifying these opportunities will necessitate the involvement of public health authorities and an appreciation of the diversity of objectives and scales across agencies at different levels (local, state, national, international). We present the case that clearly articulating surveillance objectives and systematically evaluating NDS and comparing the performance of NDS to existing surveillance data and alternative NDS data is critical and has not sufficiently been addressed in many applications of NDS currently in the literature.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Spain 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 164 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 19%
Student > Master 18 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 37 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 28 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 8%
Social Sciences 12 7%
Mathematics 10 6%
Other 44 25%
Unknown 44 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2020.
All research outputs
#788,358
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from EPJ Data Science
#56
of 457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,605
of 293,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EPJ Data Science
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.