↓ Skip to main content

Behavior and histopathology as biomarkers for evaluation of the effects of paracetamol and propranolol in the neotropical fish species Phalloceros harpagos

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Behavior and histopathology as biomarkers for evaluation of the effects of paracetamol and propranolol in the neotropical fish species Phalloceros harpagos
Published in
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11356-018-2839-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregorio Nolazco Matus, Beatriz V. R. Pereira, Elaine C. M. Silva-Zacarin, Monica Jones Costa, André Cordeiro Alves dos Santos, Bruno Nunes

Abstract

Pharmaceutical drugs in the aquatic environment can induce adverse effects on nontarget organisms. This study aimed to assess the short-term effects of sublethal concentrations of both paracetamol and propranolol on the fish Phalloceros harpagos, specifically light/dark preference, swimming patterns, skin pigmentation, histopathology, and liver glycogen levels. Fish were acutely exposed to sublethal concentrations of both paracetamol (0.008, 0.08, 0.8, 8, 80 mg L-1) and propranolol (0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1 mg L-1) under controlled conditions. For scototaxis, a significant preference for the dark compartment was observed for the group exposed to the highest concentration of paracetamol (80 mg L-1). Propranolol exposure significantly altered the swimming pattern, especially in fish exposed to the 0.001 mg L-1 concentration. Pigmentation was reduced in propranolol-exposed fish (0.1, 1 mg L-1). The lowest concentration of propranolol (0.0001 mg L-1) induced a decrease of histochemical reaction for hepatic glycogen. These data demonstrate that pharmaceuticals can induce sublethal effects in nontarget organisms, even at low concentrations, compromising specific functions of the individual with ecological relevance, such as energy balance and behavior.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 20%
Student > Master 8 12%
Researcher 5 8%
Lecturer 5 8%
Professor 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 20 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 12%
Environmental Science 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 22 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2018.
All research outputs
#21,420,714
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#7,000
of 9,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,956
of 334,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#134
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,883 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.