↓ Skip to main content

Identification of the Thoracic Duct Using Indocyanine Green During Cervical Lymphadenectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Identification of the Thoracic Duct Using Indocyanine Green During Cervical Lymphadenectomy
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, August 2018
DOI 10.1245/s10434-018-6690-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffery Chakedis, Lawrence A. Shirley, Alicia M. Terando, Roman Skoracki, John E. Phay

Abstract

Injury to the thoracic duct (TD) is the most common complication after a left lateral neck dissection, and it carries a high degree of morbidity. Currently, no routine diagnostic imaging is used to assist with TD identification intraoperatively. This report describes the first clinical experience with lymphangiography using indocyanine green (ICG) during lateral neck dissections. In six patients undergoing left lateral neck dissection (levels 2-4) for either thyroid cancer or melanoma, 2.5-5 mg of ICG was injected in the dorsum of the left foot 15 min before imaging. Intraoperative imaging was performed with a hand-held near infrared (NIR) camera (Hamamatsu, PDE-Neo, Hamamatsu City, Japan). In five patients, the TD was visualized using NIR fluorescence, with a time of 15-90 min from injection to identification. Imaging was optimized by positioning the camera at the angle of the mandible and pointing into the space below the clavicle. No adverse reactions from the ICG injection occurred, and the time required for imaging was 5-10 min. No intraoperative TD injury was identified, and no chyle leak occurred postoperatively. For the one patient in whom the TD was not identified, it is unclear whether this was related to the timing of the injection or to duct obliteration from a prior dissection. This is the first described application of ICG lymphangiography to identify the thoracic duct during left lateral neck dissection. Identification of TD with ICG is technically feasible, simple to perform with NIR imaging, and safe, making it a potential important adjunct for the surgeon.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 16%
Other 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 7 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,969,145
of 24,615,420 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#388
of 6,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,191
of 335,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#23
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,615,420 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,963 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.